Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, Volume 15, Issue 2, No 30, Year 2024, Pages 185-210

    The Nature and Limitations of Applying Rational Choice Theory in Explaining Non-Economic Phenomena

    Article Type: 
    Research
    Writers:
    ✍️ Ataollah Rafiee Atani / Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management, Economics and Progress Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology / rafieiatani@iust.ac.ir
    185-210 2025/03/06 2025/05/17 2024/08/22
    dor 20.1001.1.20422322.1403.15.2.9.3
    doi Registering DOI...⏳
    Abstract: 
    Rational choice theory provides the foundational framework for formulating all assumptions of neoclassical economic theories based on the model of homo economicus. As a conceptual construct, homo economicus has emerged as the central subject of economic science, resulting in the development of economic theories—particularly in microeconomics—through a deductive approach derived from its characteristics. Self-interest, individualism, and perfect rationality are among the core attributes of this model. Despite its numerous limitations, rational choice theory possesses significant explanatory power in analyzing economic behavior. Employing an analytical approach, this study demonstrates that while the theory has faced fundamental criticisms within economics, especially from institutional economics grounded in sociological insights and behavioral economics rooted in psychological findings—it has gradually been extended to explain various aspects of human behavior in broader social domains such as culture, family, politics, religion, and law. This paper examines the underlying reasons for such extensions and seeks to illuminate the psychological, sociological, and ethical limitations of this generalization, with the aim of contributing to the formulation of a more comprehensive theory of rationality.
    Keywords: 
    Rational choice theory
    Homo Economicus
    public choice theory
    Economics of the Family
    Law and Economics
    Economics of Religion
    چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
    Title :ماهیت و محدودیت‌های به‌کارگیری نظریۀ انتخاب عقلایی در تبیین امور غیراقتصادی
    Abstract: 
    نظریۀ انتخاب عقلایی، چارچوبی برای صورت‌بندی تمام مفروضات نظریات اقتصاد نئوکلاسیک بر مدار الگوی انسان اقتصادی است. انسان اقتصادی یک مدل مفهومی است که به موضوع محوری دانش اقتصاد تبدیل شده است؛ درنتیجه نظریات اقتصادی با محوریت اقتصاد خرد به‌نحو قیاسی از خصوصیات آن استخراج شده است. منفعت‌طلبی، فردگرایی و عقلانیت کامل از خصوصیات اصلی انسان اقتصادی است. این نظریه به‌رغم محدودیت‌های متعدد، اما از قابلیت زیادی برای تبیین رفتارهای اقتصادی برخوردار است. در این مقاله با استفاده از روش تحلیلی نشان داده شده است که این نظریه با اینکه در چارچوب دانش اقتصاد از سوی اقتصاد نهادگرایی بر اساس نظریات جامعه‌شناختی و اقتصاد رفتاری بر اساس نظریات روان‌شناختی مورد نقد اساسی واقع شده است، اما به‌تدریج به‌منظور تبیین همۀ رفتارهای آدمی در حوزه‌های دیگر زندگی اجتماعی نظیر فرهنگ، خانواده، سیاست، دین و حقوق نیز به‌کار گرفته شده است. در این مقاله با بررسی دلایل این تعمیم، تلاش شده است تا محدودیت‌های روان‌شناختی، جامعه‌شناختی و اخلاقی این تعمیم ـ به‌منظور نیل به یک نظریۀ جامع عقلانیت ـ نشان داده شود.
    Keywords: 
    نظریه انتخاب عقلائی
    انسان اقتصادی
    نظریه انتخاب عمومی
    اقتصاد خانواده
    اقتصاد حقوق
    اقتصاد دین
    References: 
    • جوادی یگانه، محمدرضا (1387). رویکرد جامعه‌شناسانۀ نظریۀ انتخاب عقلانی. راهبرد فرهنگ، 1(3)، 33ـ64.
    • دامی، سانجیت (1400 و 1401). مبانی تحلیل‌‌های اقتصاد رفتاری. ترجمۀ عطاالله رفیعی آتانی و مهیار حسنی. تهران: مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.
    • دورکیم، امیل (1378). قواعد و روش جامعه‌شناسی. ترجمۀ محمدعلی کاردان. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
    • دورکیم، امیل (1379). خودکشی. ترجمۀ نادر سالارزاده امیری. تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
    • کلمن، جیمز (1377). بنیادهای نظریۀ اجتماعی. ترجمۀ منوچهر صبوری کاشانی. تهران: نی.
    • کوتر، رابرت و یولن، تامس (1388). حقوق و اقتصاد. ترجمۀ یدالله دادگر و حامده اخوان هزاوه.تهران: پژوهشکدۀ اقتصاد دانشگاه تربیت مدرس و نور علم.
    • کین، مارک و آیزنک، مایکل (1402). روان‌شناسی شناختی. ترجمۀ اکبر رهنما و محمدرضا فریدی. تهران: آییژ.
    • مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی (1398). نقد و بررسی مکاتب اخلاقی. قم: مؤسسۀ آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی.
    • وبر، ماکس (1384). اقتصاد و جامعه. ترجمۀ عباس منوچهرى، مهرداد ترابی‌نژاد و مصطفى عمادزاده. تهران: سمت.
    References: 
    • Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press.
    • Azzi, Corry, and Ehrenberg, Ronald (1975). Household Allocation of Time and Church Attendance. Journal of Political Economy, 83(1), 27-56. 
    • Becker G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. J. Polit. Econ. 82, S11–S26.
    • Becker G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
    • Becker G. S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
    • Becker, G. (1968). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
    • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
    • Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
    • Becker, Gary S., and Murphy, Kevin M. (1988). A Theory of Rational Addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675-700.
    • Becker, Gary S., Grossman, Michael, and Murphy, Kevin M. (1994). An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction. American Economic Review, 84, 396-418. 
    • Buchanan, J. M. (1962). The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (with Gordon Tullock). University of Michigan Press.
    • Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. University of Chicago Press.
    • Buchanan, J. M. (1985). Liberty, Market and State: Political Economy in the 1980s. Wheatsheaf Books.
    • Chaves M., Cann D. E. (1992). Regulation, pluralism, and religious market structure: explaining religion’s vitality. Ration. Soc, 4, 272–290.
    • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405.
    • Coleman J. S. (1993). The rational reconstruction of society. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58, 1–15.
    • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
    • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
    • Cornish D. B., Clarke RV, e. d. s. (1986). The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectiveson Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.
    • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row.
    • Durkin, John T., J. r., and Greeley, Andrew M. (1991). A Model of Religious Choice Under Uncertainty: On Responding Rationally to the Nonrational. Rationality and Society, 3(2), 178-96.
    • Elster, J. (1979). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge University Press.
    • Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge University Press.
    • Elster, J. (1986). Rational Choice: Background and Some Lacunae. In Rational Choice. ed. J. Elster. New York University Press.
    • Elster, J. (1989). The Nature and Scope of Rational-Choice Explanation. In The Philosophy of Social Explanation. ed. A. Ryan. Oxford University Press.
    • Elster, J. (2009). Reason and Rationality. Princeton University Press.
    • Finke R, Stark R. (1988). Religious economies and sacred canopies: religions mobilization in American cities, 1906. Am. Sociol. Rev, 53, 41–49.
    • Gerrard, Bill (2006). The Economics of ratonality, published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library.
    • Goff, Brian L., and Tollison, Robert D. (1987). The Allocation of Death in the Vietnam War: A Public Choice Perspective. Southern Economic Journal, 54(2), 316-21.
    • Green, D. P. & Shapiro, I. (1994(. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science Yale University Press.
    • Hamermesh, Daniel S., and Soss, Neal M. (1974). An Economic Theory of Suicide. journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 83-98.
    • Hechter, M. & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological Rational Choice Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 191-214.
    • Hoem J. M. (1993). Public policy as the fuel of fertility: effects of a policy reform on the pace of childbearing in Sweden in the 1980s. Acta Sociol, 36, 19-31.
    • Horney J., Marshall I. H. (1992). Risk perceptions among serious offenders: the role of crime and punishment. Criminology, 30, 575-94.
    • Iannaccone L. R. (1992). Sacrifice and stigma: reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectivities. J. Polit. Econ, 100, 271-91.
    • Iannaccone, L. R. (1991). The Consequences of Religious Market Structure: Adam Smith and the Economics of Religion. Rationality and Society, 3(2), 156-177.
    • Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465-1495.
    • Jacobs B. A. (1996). Crack dealers and restrictive deterrence: identifying narcs. Criminology, 34, 409-31.
    • Staddon, John (2014). The New Behaviorism, Psychology Press.
    • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
    • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
    • Kelley D. (1972). Why Conservative Churches, are Growing. New York: Harper & Row.
    • Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
    • Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
    • Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A. (1989). An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 325-363.
    • Laurence R. (1984). Consumption Capital and Habit Formation with an Application to Religious Participation. U. Chicago P.h.D. Dissertation. 
    • Laurence R. (1990). Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion 29(3), 297-314.
    • Laurence R. (1998). Introduction to the Economics of Religion. Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI, 1465-96.
    • MacLeod J. (1995). Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    • Mill, John Stuart (1844) [1967]. On the Definition of Political Economy and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It. In Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. reprinted in Essays on Economics and Society, 1824–1845. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    • Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), 169-190.
    • North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
    • Pezzin L. E. (1995). Earnings prospects, matching effects, and the decision to terminate a criminal career. J. Quant. Criminol, 11, 29-50.
    • Piliavin I., Thornton C., Gartner R., Matsueda R. L. (1986). Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. Am. Sociol. Rev, 51, 101-19
    • Posner, Richard A. (2007). Economic Analysis of Law (7th ed.). Aspen Publishers.
    • Riker, W. H. (1982). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. W. H. Freeman.
    • Simon, Herbert, (2000). Bounded Rationality in Social Science. Today and Tomorrow, Mind & Society.
    • South SJ, Lloyd K. M. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. Am. Sociol. Rev, 60, 21–35.
    • Stark, R. & Bainbridge, W. S. (1987). A Theory of Religion. Peter Lang Publishing.
    • Stark, R. & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. University of California Press.
    • Stark, R. (1992). Do Catholic societies really exist? Rationality and Society, 4(3), 261-271.
    • Treas J. (1993). Money in the bank: transaction costs and the economic organization of marriage. Am. Sociol. Rev, 58, 723-34.
    • William O'Donohue (1998). Richard Kitchener, Handbook of Behaviorism, Academic Press.
    • 303 reads
    Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
    Cite this article: RIS Mendeley BibTeX APA MLA HARVARD VANCOUVER

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Rafiee Atani, Ataollah. (2024) The Nature and Limitations of Applying Rational Choice Theory in Explaining Non-Economic Phenomena. Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 15(2), 185-210 https://doi.org/10.22034/marefateeqtesadi.2025.5001770.

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Ataollah Rafiee Atani."The Nature and Limitations of Applying Rational Choice Theory in Explaining Non-Economic Phenomena". Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 15, 2, 2024, 185-210

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Rafiee Atani, A.(2024) 'The Nature and Limitations of Applying Rational Choice Theory in Explaining Non-Economic Phenomena', Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 15(2), pp. 185-210

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Rafiee Atani, A. The Nature and Limitations of Applying Rational Choice Theory in Explaining Non-Economic Phenomena. Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 2024; 15(2): 185-210