Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, Volume 2, Issue 2, No 4, Year 2011, Pages 107-126

    The Methodology of Designing a Synthetic Indicator for Evaluating Innovation in the Context of an Islamic- Iranian Pattern of Progress

    Article Type: 
    Research
    Writers:
    Seyed habibollah / Assistant Professor of Industrial Management Department, 'Allameh Tabatabaii University. / tabatabaeian@iramot.ir
    Reza Naghizadeh / PhD Student of science and technology policy making, Tarbiat Modarres University. / rezanaghizadeh@yahoo.com
    محمد نقی زاده / PhD Student of Technology Management, 'Allameh Tabatabaii University.
    107-126 2011/07/11 2011/08/25 2011/12/14
    Abstract: 
    One of the most basic factors of any planning is the measurement of a country's progress within the framework of a reliable pattern. Such a pattern can be the basis for identifying the real status of the performance of those who play a major role in different fields of national development and can prepare the ground for the convergence of all scientific, technical, industrial, and economic activities. Using synthetic indicators is one of the means of policy-making in the areas related to innovation. These indicators provide comparability for different countries in the field of innovation. In the meantime, the way these indicators develop in the field of innovation and the study of the way of development of all models and their disadvantages are given special importance. Using an analytical method, the present paper investigates the proposed patterns of developing synthetic indicators. Hence some of the most important international models related to innovation have been reviewed. According to the research findings, designing synthetic indicators in the context of an Islamic-Iranian pattern of progress requires the formation of three groups: theorization, methodology and compilation.
    Keywords: 
    Synthetic Indicator
    innovation
    development
    Islamic-Iranian Pattern of Progress.
    چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
    Title :روش‌شناسی ایجاد شاخص ترکیبی ارزیابی نوآوری در راستای الگوی اسلامی و ایرانی پیشرفت
    Abstract: 
    سنجش پیشرفت کشور در قالب الگوئی قابل اتکاء از اساسی ترین ارکان هرگونه برنامه ریزی محسوب می شود. این الگو می تواند مبنایی برای شناسایی وضعیت واقعی عملکرد بازیگران عرصه های مختلف توسعه ملی باشد و زمینه همگرائی تمامی فعالیتهای علمی، فنی، صنعتی و اقتصادی را فراهم آورد. یکی از ابزارهای سیاست گذاری در حوزه های مرتبط با نوآوری، بهره گیری از شاخص های ترکیبی می باشد. این شاخص ها قابلیت مقایسه ای را برای کشورهای مختلف در عرصه نوآوری فراهم می آورد. در این بین نحوه توسعه این شاخص ها در حوزه نوآوری و همچنین بررسی چگونگی توسعه سایر مدل ها و نقاط ضعف آن دارای اهمیت ویژه است. در این تحقیق سعی شده است تا با استفاده از روش تحلیلی، الگوهای پیشنهادی جهت توسعه شاخص های ترکیبی بررسی شود. در این چارچوب برخی از مهمترین مدل های بین المللی مرتبط با نوآوری مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. بر اساس یافته های مقاله، طراحی شاخص های ترکیبی در راستای الگوی اسلامی ایرانی پیشرفت نیازمند شکل گیری گروه های سه گانه نظریه پردازی، روش شناسی و جمع آوری داده است.
    Keywords: 
    توسعه
    نوآوری
    شاخص ترکیبی
    الگوی اسلامی و ایرانی پیشرفت.
    References: 
    • انجمن مديريت فناوري ايران، گزارش پايش جهاني توانمندي فناوري، 1388، www.iramot.ir
    • طباطبائيان، سيد حبيب ا... و همكاران، «شاخص تركيبي پايش توانمندي فناوري؛ بررسي وضعيت توانمندي فناوري ايران و 69 كشور دنيا»، فصلنامه سياست علم و فناوري، سال دوم، ش4، 1389، ص 92-77.
    • Archibugi, D., Coco, A., "A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries". World Development, v 32(4), 2004, p 629-654.
    • Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R., Probert, D., "Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities", Technovation, v 29, 2009, p 237–246.
    • Little, R.J.A., Rubin D.B., "Statistical Analysis with Missing Data", Wiley Inter science,New Jersey, J. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2002.
    • OECD, "Handbook on Constructing composite Indicators: Methodology and user Guide". www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda, 2008.
    • Onsel, S. et al., Y., "A new perspective on the competitiveness of nations", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, v 42, 2008, p 221–246.
    • Saisana, M., Tarantola, S., "State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development", EUR Report 20408 EN, European Commission, JRC-IPSC, Italy, 2002.
    • Saltelli, A., "Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy", Social Indicators Research, v 81, 2007, p 65-77.
    • United Nations Industrial Development Organization(UNIDO), "Industrial Development Report 2002–2003". Competing through Innovation and Learning, Vienna, http://www.unido.org, 2002.
    • United Nations Industrial Development Organization(UNIDO), "Industrial Development Report 2004". Industrialization, Environment and the Millennium Development Goals in Sub-Saharan Africa,The new frontier in the fight against poverty, http://www.unido.org, 2004.
    • United Nations Industrial Development Organization(UNIDO), "Industrial Development Report 2009", Breaking In and Moving Up: New Industrial Challenges for the Bottom Billion and the Middle-Income Countries, http://www.unido.org, 2009.
    • United Nations Development Program (UNDP), "Human Development Report 2001", Making New Technologies Work for Human Development, Oxford University Press, New York,http://www.undp.org, 2001.
    • Wagner, C.S., Brahmakulam, I.T., Brian, A., Jackson, A.,Wong,T.Y., "Science and Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries", RAND Corporation, Washington, DC, Document No: MR-1357.0-WB, 2001.
    • World Bank institute, "Measuring Knowledge in the World Economies", Washington, DC, www.worldbank.org, 2008.
    • World Bank institute, "Measuring Knowledge in the World Economies", Washington, DC, www.worldbank.org, 2009.
    • World Economic Forum (WEF), "The Global Competitiveness Report". Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
    • World Economic Froum (WEF)., "The Global Competitiveness Report 2008-2009". Geneva, Printed and bound in Switzerland by SRO-Kundig, 2008.
    • World Economic Forum (WEF), "The Global Competitiveness Report", Geneva, 2009.
    • World Economic Forum (WEF), "The Global Competitiveness Report".Geneva, 2010.
    • 239 reads
    Copyright © 2011 The Author(s). This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
    Cite this article: RIS Mendeley BibTeX APA MLA HARVARD VANCOUVER

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    , Seyed habibollah, Naghizadeh, Reza, , . (2011) The Methodology of Designing a Synthetic Indicator for Evaluating Innovation in the Context of an Islamic- Iranian Pattern of Progress. Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 2(2), 107-126

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Seyed habibollah ; Reza Naghizadeh; ."The Methodology of Designing a Synthetic Indicator for Evaluating Innovation in the Context of an Islamic- Iranian Pattern of Progress". Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 2, 2, 2011, 107-126

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    , S, Naghizadeh, R, , .(2011) 'The Methodology of Designing a Synthetic Indicator for Evaluating Innovation in the Context of an Islamic- Iranian Pattern of Progress', Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 2(2), pp. 107-126

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    , S, Naghizadeh, R, , . The Methodology of Designing a Synthetic Indicator for Evaluating Innovation in the Context of an Islamic- Iranian Pattern of Progress. Ma`rifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami, 2011; 2(2): 107-126