معرفت اقتصاد اسلامی

**Research Question:** Can the jurisprudential solutions proposed for validating the guarantee clause (*Shart al-Daman*) in *Mudarabah* contracts be extended to the profit guarantee clause (*Shart al-Ribh*)? **Hypothesis:** The four main solutions (result clause, compensation clause, agent's gift of a specified share, and transfer of loss clause) are incapable of legitimizing the profit guarantee clause due to its substantive differences from the guarantee clause and its fundamental return to *ribā* (usury). **Method:** This study employs a descriptive-analytical method with library-based data collection. It first explicates each of the four solutions in their original context (the guarantee clause) and then systematically assesses their applicability to the profit guarantee clause from the perspectives of contractual requirements, Sharīʿah evidence, and textual sources on usury stratagems (*ḥiyal al-ribā*). **Research Gap:** The issue of the profit guarantee clause has not been independently addressed in jurisprudential literature; consequently, solutions for its validation have not been examined. This study fills this gap by systematically applying the solutions of the guarantee clause to the profit guarantee clause. **Findings:** The results indicate that the result clause is invalid due to the agent's indebtedness without actual loss of property; the compensation clause fails because it equates "compensation for lost profit" with "profit guarantee"; the agent's gift of a specified share creates coercive pressure on the agent in profitable scenarios; and the transfer of loss clause is inapplicable because it can equally be applied to usurious transactions. **Conclusion:** The profit guarantee clause in *Mudarabah* is void, and the four solutions merely constitute a change of form to circumvent the prohibition of *ribā*.